The Electric Car

E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Why not just burn Brown's gas?

Why would you want to cart around a cylinder containing a highly explosive gas
mixture when all the air you need can be found in the atmosphere ?

Why do you need an expensive electric car, when you can use technology
already in use in welders, to power a car for next to nothing?

I can't even begin to imagine what you mean. You CAN'T "power a car for next to
nothing". It's that simple.

You just separate the hydrogen and oxygen from water using electro-
statics, and presto.

Using huge quantities of electricity that'll cost more than gasoline costs.
What's the point of that ?

It is being done all over.

It is most certainly not "being done all over".


Former NASA scientists my ass !

Instead of burning fossil fuels.

If he can do it, why can't anyone else?

Because his hydrogen car is a fraud and it's not actually doing what he claims
it is. This whole area of alleged 'research' has been a absolute goldmine for
fraudsters. There have been loads of them.

You like to kill people for oil or something? Oh yeah I forgot, you
have some of the most evil people the world has ever seen running the
show and they like to fly jets and build bombs and murder people for
oil and pollute the environment because that is how they make their
money.

Learn some science before spouting off a load of nonsese next time will you ?

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
I mean if you are so down on Arabs and the people of Iran, why not
just opt for Brown's gas and make all that oil worthless?

Because you are so fucking evil, you want to murder people for simple
blood lust.

Oh Lord !

Another idiot crackpot.

Graham
 
Why would you want to cart around a cylinder containing a highly explosive gas
mixture when all the air you need can be found in the atmosphere ?


I can't even begin to imagine what you mean. You CAN'T "power a car for next to
nothing". It's that simple.


Using huge quantities of electricity that'll cost more than gasoline costs.
What's the point of that ?


It is most certainly not "being done all over".


Former NASA scientists my ass !



Because his hydrogen car is a fraud and it's not actually doing what he claims
it is. This whole area of alleged 'research' has been a absolute goldmine for
fraudsters. There have been loads of them.


Learn some science before spouting off a load of nonsese next time will you ?

Graham

Do you live in a cave?

http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/car-runs-on-water-inventor-to-be-kidnapped-by-exxon-177716.php
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
The pentagon, the pentagon, the pentagon.

Stan Meyer was prosecuted for fraud and quite rightly found guilty.

GROW UP !

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
In case you don't know what happened to Stan Myers, he went out for
dinner to a local restaurant, got poisoned, and died in the parking
lot.

He had a stroke actually.

If anyone had reason to poison him it would have been the investors he scammed.

Meyer's claims about the Water Fuel Cell and the car that it powered were found to be
fraudulent by an Ohio court in 1996.[1] Similar devices have been promoted by others;
see Water-fuelled car.

Stanley Meyer died at the age of 57 after eating at a restaurant on 21 March
1998.[citation needed] An autopsy report by Franklin County coroner William R. Adrion
showed the cause of death to be a cerebral aneurysm.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_fuel_cell

Water fuelled cars have been mentioned in urban legends since the 1930s. The story is
usually that a lone inventor invents an engine that runs on water but the idea is
suppressed by either Big Oil or automakers in order to safeguard their profits. Claims
for water fuelled power sources are often used to fraudulently extract money from
gullible investors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water-fuelled_car


Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
In case you don't know what happened to Stan Myers, he went out for
dinner to a local restaurant, got poisoned, and died in the parking
lot.

GULLIBLE MORON !
 
Bwahahahaahahaa ! Do you live in an asylum ?

Too funny. What do you do for an encore ?

Graham

Well people all over the world are doing it for themselves and youtube
is just one place where you can see all sorts of people using a simple
process of electro-statics to separate hydrogen and oxygen.

China, has been doing it for years. Korea, uses it in industry.
How are you going to stop China from burning Brown's Gas? You can't.

And making electric scooters. That is one that is really taking off.
They are made in China, and being sold all over the world.
China passed laws that people couldn't burn gas in their scooters
because of the noise and pollution and so they developed battery
powered scooters.

And now shops selling them have popped up all over America and Canada
and it costs 4 cents a day to run them, and they cost $1,500 dollars
to buy one.

Have a look at them....
This one is really cool and you don't even need a license to drive
one. You just have to be 16 and wear a helmet.
http://www.e-ride.ca/Electric_Scooters/Motorino_BTr.html

And they could make them run on Brown's gas as well, but since it only
costs 4 cents a day to run it, well they can just plug in at night and
drive it all day the next day.

But for cars, and motorhomes well you want to run them on Brown's gas
or one of the many variants.
And look at who is making them.
People in their garage.
Why is that?
Because the scientific establishment lives under totalitarian control.
They are fed bullshit and people like you reinforce that with your
posts every day.
Well its not working, Iran will retaliate if you attack them, you will
cry like babies if they do, and your country is on the brink of
economic collapse and you are treading water, because you refuse to do
the right thing.
Which is to make cars run on Brown's gas and stop trying to invade
other countries.
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Well people all over the world are doing it for themselves

You mean fraudstera all over the world.
and youtube is just one place where you can see all sorts of people using a simple
process of electro-statics to separate hydrogen and oxygen.

It's one place where the fraudsters 'advertise'. And also where clueless morons like
you congregate patting your own stupid little backs.

The 'device' in that car was making a few bubbles of Brown's Gas. Simply not enough to
power an engine but enough for a gullible journalist to fall for it.

Graham
 
You mean fraudstera all over the world.


It's one place where the fraudsters 'advertise'. And also where clueless morons like
you congregate patting your own stupid little backs.

The 'device' in that car was making a few bubbles of Brown's Gas. Simply not enough to
power an engine but enough for a gullible journalist to fall for it.

Graham

Right. I believe you. I also believe you and a lot of other people
want people to not make Brown's gas.

Except its too late to stop it.

They use it in welding equipment all over the world.

This guy from America in that video did not invent that welding
equipment. Its in common use all over the world.
 
Right. I believe you. I also believe you and a lot of other people
want people to not make Brown's gas.

Except its too late to stop it.

They use it in welding equipment all over the world.

This guy from America in that video did not invent that welding
equipment. Its in common use all over the world.

 
K

krw

Jan 1, 1970
0
Don't be so ridiculous.

That's what you said, dumb donkey. Take a look back about 6 or seven
lines.
The fact of the matter is that electric valve operation is being very seriously
researched. It offers huge advantages in terms of variable valve timing of course.
http://www.freescale.com/webapp/sps/site/application.jsp?nodeId=02Wcbf56hRCrcd

Dumb donkey, the fact of the matter is that you said electric valves
were coming back to "reduce power consumption" and "the load on the
cambelt or chain is quite significant". The fact of the matter, dumb
donkey, is that electrically actuating the valves won't reduce the
power needed to the valves one bit. It may have other advantages, but
that's *NOT* what the dumb donkey said.
Your ignorance in this matter is NO surprise. Mind you, Americans do like doing things
in 'old fashioned' ways. Tell me all about your push-rod engines won't you ? How fast
do they rev before bounce kills them ?

*I* am not the dumb donkey, dumb donkey.
 
Yeah this is really difficult to duplicate. It is rocket science.
Someday scientists will study it.

Until scientists study it though, sheep farmers in Australia will be
using it to run their tractors.

They just throw together some parts from their milking equipment and
Bob's yer uncle mate.
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Right. I believe you. I also believe you and a lot of other people
want people to not make Brown's gas.

Except its too late to stop it.

No-one's trying to STOP it ! Feel free to waste energy making it.

They use it in welding equipment all over the world.

For very specific reasons where it makes sense to do so.

This guy from America in that video did not invent that welding
equipment. Its in common use all over the world.

The fabled 'resonator' method of hydrolysis alleged to use less power than conventional
electrolysis. More 'junk science'.

Whenever scientifically tested, the claims have been shown to be false.

Even the originator of this video said he made no measurements ! So, this video shows an
example of the ordinary electrolysis of water. You get less power out than you put in.
That's pretty stupid for a start !

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Yeah this is really difficult to duplicate. It is rocket science.
Someday scientists will study it.

Scientists have known about electrolysis for a LONG LONG time.

You get less energy back (as flammable gases) than you put in (as electricity).

It's a waste of energy.

Graham
 
Top