The Electric Car

E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
They just throw together some parts from their milking equipment and
Bob's yer uncle mate.

Cluless idiots playing in the cow shed.
 
M

Martin Griffith

Jan 1, 1970
0
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:18:18 -0700, in sci.electronics.design
Yeah this is really difficult to duplicate. It is rocket science.
Someday scientists will study it.
That video didn't work very well, no sound, but
you have forgotten the 3 Laws, not Asimov's, (I met him once, a bright
lad, a lot of potential)

1) You can't win.
2) You can't break even.
3) You can't quit the game.

and I'm sure there is a theory about them, probably involving the
words "Theromodynamics, Laws, of"

Then there was this posh guy wot uttered

"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the
intelligent are full of doubt" - Bertrand Russell, maybe you have
heard of him.

Methinks that you are in the first category


Martin
 
P

Punjab The Sailor Man

Jan 1, 1970
0
The said:
In sci.physics, Eeyore
<[email protected]>
wrote


Even if legitimate, the best they can do is about on par
with a standard battery, and one has to assume capacitor
electrodes about 2 atoms wide to get there.

Plutonium batteries last longer. A nuclear powered car only needs
refueling once in 20 years with unlimited mileage. You could plug your
house into it.
 
A

Androcles

Jan 1, 1970
0
:
:
: [email protected] wrote:
:
: >
:
: Why waste energy making Brown's gas ?
:
: Graham

Why waste energy cracking petroleum from crude?
Why waste energy writing to a newsgroup when you can
go back to sleep and enjoy your stupid ignorance?
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Punjab said:
Plutonium batteries last longer. A nuclear powered car only needs
refueling once in 20 years with unlimited mileage. You could plug your
house into it.

And without a biological shield that kills the nuclear car idea stone dead, you'll also
be able to save on lighting bills since you'll be glowing in the dark.

Graham
 
A

Androcles

Jan 1, 1970
0
:
:
: [email protected] wrote:
:
: > Yeah this is really difficult to duplicate. It is rocket science.
: > Someday scientists will study it.
: >
:
: Scientists have known about electrolysis for a LONG LONG time.
:
: You get less energy back (as flammable gases) than you put in (as
electricity).
:
: It's a waste of energy.
:
: Graham

ALL energy is wasted. Power stations are 34% efficient,
give then up, go without electricity, you are wasting energy.
 
A

Androcles

Jan 1, 1970
0
:
:
: Punjab The Sailor Man wrote:
:
: > Plutonium batteries last longer. A nuclear powered car only needs
: > refueling once in 20 years with unlimited mileage. You could plug your
: > house into it.
:
: And without a biological shield that kills the nuclear car idea stone
dead, you'll also
: be able to save on lighting bills since you'll be glowing in the dark.
:
: Graham

"Cluless" idiot playing the cow shed.
 
That video didn't work very well, no sound, but
you have forgotten the 3 Laws, not Asimov's, (I met him once, a bright
lad, a lot of potential)

1) You can't win.
2) You can't break even.
3) You can't quit the game.

and I'm sure there is a theory about them, probably involving the
words "Theromodynamics, Laws, of"

Then there was this posh guy wot uttered

"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the
intelligent are full of doubt" - Bertrand Russell, maybe you have
heard of him.

Methinks that you are in the first category


Martin

There are none so blind as cannot even believe what an Aussie sheep farmer
shows them.

Watch it for yourself. Watch him run a car, with this rudimentary device.

 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
lol Oh yes we believe you.


Clever looking demonstrations with no measurements are purely there to impress the
terminally foolish.

That means fuckwits like YOU.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Androcles said:
: [email protected] wrote:
:
: >
:
: Why waste energy making Brown's gas ?
:
: Graham

Why waste energy cracking petroleum from crude?
Why waste energy writing to a newsgroup when you can
go back to sleep and enjoy your stupid ignorance?

Does your head rattle ?

It must be that pea inside it.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Androcles said:
: [email protected] wrote:
:
: > Yeah this is really difficult to duplicate. It is rocket science.
: > Someday scientists will study it.
: >
:
: Scientists have known about electrolysis for a LONG LONG time.
:
: You get less energy back (as flammable gases) than you put in (as
electricity).
:
: It's a waste of energy.
:
: Graham

ALL energy is wasted. Power stations are 34% efficient,
give then up, go without electricity, you are wasting energy.

If power stations ran on Brown's gas they'd be maybe 20% efficient.

That's the point.

Graham
 
No-one's trying to STOP it ! Feel free to waste energy making it.



For very specific reasons where it makes sense to do so.



The fabled 'resonator' method of hydrolysis alleged to use less power than conventional
electrolysis. More 'junk science'.

Whenever scientifically tested, the claims have been shown to be false.

Even the originator of this video said he made no measurements ! So, this video shows an
example of the ordinary electrolysis of water. You get less power out than you put in.
That's pretty stupid for a start !

Graham

There is audio in this video. You just have to turn up the vlume a little.
In this video, the sheep farmer explains the plates inside a simple device for
separating hydrogen and oxygen.
He then hooks it up directly to the carbuerator, and then starts the car/van.

The think weighs 5 pounds and is contained in an old brown sugar jar so you can
see it in action.


It has water in a jar, and a simple series of plates and a metal mesh around
the plates.

He attaches the battery to the cell, and when the engine runs, the alternator
in the motor, increases its current as it charges your car battery, but that
same principal, produces enough gas to fire the motor and to increase the gas
production as you accellerate the motor.

There you see a car running on water. On a device worth at most 100 bucks,
made by a sheep farmer.

You could make it recycle the water coming out of the exhaust as some have
done.

You can easily get 100 mpg on a liter of water. And it is safe because it
doesn't store gas. It only produces what it needs.

So all this talk abvout how the pentagon and NASA have been studying this for
20 years well maybe they should just fire all their scientists and hire some
aussie sheep farmers because they are doing in their garages, what the huge
billion dollar budget people can't do.

Funding NASA or the pentagon is a waste of money because all they can do is
make 15 million dollar toilets and 5 million dollar hammers.

Cars like this could be in production in two weeks. If people took the time to
install these simple devices.

Tested for 30 years and proved safe.

And all you have to do is full up your tank with tap water.
No pollution.
 
A

Androcles

Jan 1, 1970
0
:
:
: Androcles wrote:
:
: > : [email protected] wrote:
: > :
: > : >
: > :
: > : Why waste energy making Brown's gas ?
: > :
: > : Graham
: >
: > Why waste energy cracking petroleum from crude?
: > Why waste energy writing to a newsgroup when you can
: > go back to sleep and enjoy your stupid ignorance?
:
: Does your head rattle ?
:
: It must be that pea inside it.

Yours cannot rattle, it is fuckin' empty, you wanker.
Answer the question, dumbfuck!
Why waste energy cracking petroleum from crude?
 
A

Androcles

Jan 1, 1970
0
:
:
: Androcles wrote:
:
: > : [email protected] wrote:
: > :
: > : > Yeah this is really difficult to duplicate. It is rocket science.
: > : > Someday scientists will study it.
: > : >
: > :
: > : Scientists have known about electrolysis for a LONG LONG time.
: > :
: > : You get less energy back (as flammable gases) than you put in (as
: > electricity).
: > :
: > : It's a waste of energy.
: > :
: > : Graham
: >
: > ALL energy is wasted. Power stations are 34% efficient,
: > give then up, go without electricity, you are wasting energy.
:
: If power stations ran on Brown's gas they'd be maybe 20% efficient.
:
: That's the point.

How do calculate efficiency, dumbfuck? Oh wait, I know...
you say "they'd be maybe" and hope to make a point. You failed...
miserably, cracker.
Cars are 18% efficient, give them up, go back to hunting mammoth,
Neanderthal, and carry on dragging your knuckles.
That's the point.
You do know what a graham cracker is, I suppose?
 
No-one's trying to STOP it ! Feel free to waste energy making it.


For very specific reasons where it makes sense to do so.


The fabled 'resonator' method of hydrolysis alleged to use less power than conventional
electrolysis. More 'junk science'.

Whenever scientifically tested, the claims have been shown to be false.

Even the originator of this video said he made no measurements ! So, this video shows an
example of the ordinary electrolysis of water. You get less power out than you put in.
That's pretty stupid for a start !

Graham

bla bla bla it will never fly. Do you go to airports and say that? Are
you one of those nay sayers?

If you lived in the country, or on a farm, you would want to have a
solar battery setup, and then you would produce your own power for
your equipment for free using water. And not only that, but it has so
many uses. From welding to running cars and tractors to heating water
or heating your home.

 
J

John Fields

Jan 1, 1970
0
Clever looking demonstrations with no measurements are purely there to impress the
terminally foolish.

That means fuckwits like YOU.

---
Clever-sounding arguments with no basis in logic are purely there to
impress the fuckwits who pose them.

That means fuckwits like you.

Most of the rest of us can't stand you.
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Androcles said:
: Androcles wrote:
: > : [email protected] wrote:
: > :
: > : >
: > :
: > : Why waste energy making Brown's gas ?
: > :
: > : Graham
: >
: > Why waste energy cracking petroleum from crude?
: > Why waste energy writing to a newsgroup when you can
: > go back to sleep and enjoy your stupid ignorance?
:
: Does your head rattle ?
:
: It must be that pea inside it.

Yours cannot rattle, it is fuckin' empty, you wanker.
Answer the question, dumbfuck!
Why waste energy cracking petroleum from crude?

It's not *wasted*. In its raw form crude isn't a lot of use. It need fractioning
to be turned into useful stuff.

Graham
 
Top