E
Eeyore
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
They just throw together some parts from their milking equipment and
Bob's yer uncle mate.
Cluless idiots playing in the cow shed.
They just throw together some parts from their milking equipment and
Bob's yer uncle mate.
That video didn't work very well, no sound, butYeah this is really difficult to duplicate. It is rocket science.
Someday scientists will study it.
The said:In sci.physics, Eeyore
<[email protected]>
wrote
Even if legitimate, the best they can do is about on par
with a standard battery, and one has to assume capacitor
electrodes about 2 atoms wide to get there.
Scientists have known about electrolysis for a LONG LONG time.
You get less energy back (as flammable gases) than you put in (as electricity).
It's a waste of energy.
Graham
Punjab said:Plutonium batteries last longer. A nuclear powered car only needs
refueling once in 20 years with unlimited mileage. You could plug your
house into it.
That video didn't work very well, no sound, but
you have forgotten the 3 Laws, not Asimov's, (I met him once, a bright
lad, a lot of potential)
1) You can't win.
2) You can't break even.
3) You can't quit the game.
and I'm sure there is a theory about them, probably involving the
words "Theromodynamics, Laws, of"
Then there was this posh guy wot uttered
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the
intelligent are full of doubt" - Bertrand Russell, maybe you have
heard of him.
Methinks that you are in the first category
Martin
lol Oh yes we believe you.
Androcles said:: [email protected] wrote:
:
: >:
: Why waste energy making Brown's gas ?
:
: Graham
Why waste energy cracking petroleum from crude?
Why waste energy writing to a newsgroup when you can
go back to sleep and enjoy your stupid ignorance?
Androcles said:: [email protected] wrote:
:
: > Yeah this is really difficult to duplicate. It is rocket science.
: > Someday scientists will study it.
: >:
: Scientists have known about electrolysis for a LONG LONG time.
:
: You get less energy back (as flammable gases) than you put in (as
electricity).
:
: It's a waste of energy.
:
: Graham
ALL energy is wasted. Power stations are 34% efficient,
give then up, go without electricity, you are wasting energy.
No-one's trying to STOP it ! Feel free to waste energy making it.
For very specific reasons where it makes sense to do so.
The fabled 'resonator' method of hydrolysis alleged to use less power than conventional
electrolysis. More 'junk science'.
Whenever scientifically tested, the claims have been shown to be false.
Even the originator of this video said he made no measurements ! So, this video shows an
example of the ordinary electrolysis of water. You get less power out than you put in.
That's pretty stupid for a start !
Graham
No-one's trying to STOP it ! Feel free to waste energy making it.
For very specific reasons where it makes sense to do so.
The fabled 'resonator' method of hydrolysis alleged to use less power than conventional
electrolysis. More 'junk science'.
Whenever scientifically tested, the claims have been shown to be false.
Even the originator of this video said he made no measurements ! So, this video shows an
example of the ordinary electrolysis of water. You get less power out than you put in.
That's pretty stupid for a start !
Graham
Clever looking demonstrations with no measurements are purely there to impress the
terminally foolish.
That means fuckwits like YOU.
Does your head rattle ?
It must be that pea inside it.
If power stations ran on Brown's gas they'd be maybe 20% efficient.
Androcles said:: Androcles wrote:
: > : [email protected] wrote:
: > :
: > : >: > :
: > : Why waste energy making Brown's gas ?
: > :
: > : Graham
: >
: > Why waste energy cracking petroleum from crude?
: > Why waste energy writing to a newsgroup when you can
: > go back to sleep and enjoy your stupid ignorance?
:
: Does your head rattle ?
:
: It must be that pea inside it.
Yours cannot rattle, it is fuckin' empty, you wanker.
Answer the question, dumbfuck!
Why waste energy cracking petroleum from crude?