Jump to content
Electronics-Lab.com Community
Sign in to follow this  
Kevin Weddle

Very long RC time contant!

Recommended Posts

The RC time constant must be long enough with repect to the signal time to cleanly pass the signal through the capacitor.

Is this statement true or false?

Answer : True.

I wanted to revisit this topic because I was sharply denounced last time. Now, I know the truth. Any takers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The RC time constant must be long enough with repect to the signal time to cleanly pass the signal through the capacitor.

Is this statement true or false?

Answer : True.

I wanted to revisit this topic because I was sharply denounced last time. Now, I know the truth. Any takers?

You are probably talking about an audio coupling capacitor.
The time constant of the capacitor with the impedance of the input of the next stage is usually calculated to form a highpass filter, so at the cutoff frequency the signal begins to be impeded and is not cleanly passed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The triangle is the trick. It's not seen using a sinewave. The low frequency triangle allows the other side of the capacitor to go to bias too quickly. The instantaneous voltage of the input charges the capacitor like DC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not seen using a sinewave.

Of course a sinewave or any other waveshape is affected by the time constant of a coupling capacitor.
At the frequency where the reactance of the capacitor equals the impedance of its load, the circuit's output level is down 3dB which is a loss of -0.707.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you meant equal impedance, that would be half the voltage. Your thinking resonant frequency.

That is not true. A capacitor has phase-shift that causes the response to be 0.707 instead of half the voltage. Half the voltage is created by two equal resistors that don't have phase-shift.
Look at RC filters in Google.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


What is funny, if you start a sinewave on an RC just up to 90 degree and stop, the capacitor still gets voltage, rather than remaining at zero. It's not going to wait until the input starts to go down, because it may not go down.

I plotted RC phase shift on paper one time using a triangle. I set the resistor equal to the capacitive reactance. Let's say they are both 100 ohms. If the input is 20Vpp, then capacitors about 14Vpp and the resistors about 6Vpp. When the input reaches +10V, the resistor must be at +3V and the capacitor at +7V. The resistor can't be at +4V because it doesn't go that high. It could be +2V, that would put the capacitor at +8V, but the capacitor doesn't go that high. The resistor could be +2V and the capacitor +7V, But that is only +9V total.

Since the inputs at +10V, the resistors at +3V, and the capacitor is at +7V, don't they all appear to be in phase?


But everywhere else, besides the peak, like in this example, the different phases and voltages seem plausable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At what frequency did you calculate the capacitive reactance? You are aware that triangular waves are a bunch of sine waves at different harmonic frequencies and amplitudes summed together, right (a.k.a. Fourier Analysis)? Phase shift only pertains to voltage in relation to current or vise versa. Voltage or current by themselves don't have any phase shift.

Recall "ELI the ICE man" voltage (E) leads current (I)in a Inductor (L) and Current (I) leads Voltage (E) in a capacitor © by 90 degrees. Or if you preffer, current (I) lags voltage (E) in an inductor (L)... etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Audioguru, that phase thing has nothing to do with impedance and voltage drop. I have not been building circuits for a long time, so it took me a few to figure it out. You take the 2pi out of the reactance equation to get the voltage divider.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course a voltage divider made with a resistor in series with a capacitor to ground have a phase shift.  At the frequency that the reactance of the capacitor is the same as the resistor's value, the level is 0.707 times, not half. It is called a lowpass filter. 0.707 times is 3dB down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, not once have I ever read anything about how you arrived at that. If I had to include phase into the voltage divider, I would be stuck. And so would my books author. Just remove 2pi from the reactance equation. It works perfect and with no surprise. And you know, discovering this a bit late in life doesn't bother me one bit. That equation is about as useless as alpha, IIR, and cycles per second.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A diagram of response vs phase-shift can be shown with phasors, but I couldn't find one.
All tutorials show that the response of an RC lowpass filter is down 3dB (times 0.707) at the cutoff frequency where the reactance of the capacitor equals the resistance of the resistor:

post-1706-14279142861773_thumb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...