Compass Software

[Crash Gordon]

guess not...she's far from sultry..she's like 90 years old and from Hoboken.


message |
| | > sultry?
|
| He doesn't "get out" much... )
|
|
|

 

[Crash Gordon]

that unblocks it right?...he was saying he was blocking the cid.

message |
| | > But if you block your line and the client has do not accept blocked
calls
| > wont you have a prob connecting?
|
|
| Not if you dial *81 first...
|
|
|

 

[Frank Olson]

guess not...she's far from sultry..she's like 90 years old and from
Hoboken.

That's about Jack's speed alright...

 

[alarman]

up here *69 results in some sultry throated damsel saying "the last number
to call your line was ..."

That happens here too, unless the caller ID was blocked. Then you get "The
last number that called your line can not be given out."
js

 

[alarman]

But if you block your line and the client has do not accept blocked calls
wont you have a prob connecting?

Yup. I haven't run into that much though.
js

 

[alarman]

that unblocks it right?...he was saying he was blocking the cid.

Oh I see what you mean. No, I meant that I do not program my fax machine to
send it's number and ID info. You know, what makes that little header that
appears at the top of the pages you send, and causes your fax number to
appear on the machine at the other end.
js

 

[alarman]

That's about Jack's speed alright...

Nine to ninety, and not dead over two hours.
js

 

[alarman]

you know that's not kosher to do that...actually i believe it's illegal to
not show your fax id info.

I know. The cops seem to be busy with other things though.
js

 

[alarman]

Is that a rule or a guideline?

Neither. Just something my old boss used to say.
js

 

[Crash Gordon]

you know that's not kosher to do that...actually i believe it's illegal to
not show your fax id info.


|
| | > that unblocks it right?...he was saying he was blocking the cid.
|
| Oh I see what you mean. No, I meant that I do not program my fax machine
to
| send it's number and ID info. You know, what makes that little header that
| appears at the top of the pages you send, and causes your fax number to
| appear on the machine at the other end.
| js
|
|

 

[mikey]

1.. Very humid and hot: sultry July weather.
2.. Extremely hot; torrid: the sultry sands of the desert.
3.. Expressing or arousing desire: a sultry look; a sultry dance.

 

[mikey]

Oh great! Thanks a lot, burst my bubble.

 

[Mark Leuck]

I know. The cops seem to be busy with other things though.
js

Next on COPS...

"FREEZE AND DROP THAT FAX LINE NOW!"

Make sure you are wearing shorts, no shirt and be half drunk please

 

[Crash Gordon]

i thought you liked the older wimmins?



| 1.. Very humid and hot: sultry July weather.
| 2.. Extremely hot; torrid: the sultry sands of the desert.
| 3.. Expressing or arousing desire: a sultry look; a sultry dance.
| | > sultry?
| >
| >
| > | > | | > | >
| > | > | > | > > I used to do that but got rid of the fax line, too much crap using
| up
| > | > paper
| > | > > and time. Email has replaced most of it, I use home line the odd
| time
| > | it's
| > | > > unavoidable. I do miss it for UL/DL though.
| > | >
| > | > All incoming faxes come to my PC (Winfax pro). I have a fax machine
| for
| > | > outgoing only, but it won't receive them. I got tired of paying for
| > paper
| > | > and toner for the fucking ads. Now I just press the delete button
and
| > | > they're gone.
| > | >
| > | > > Station ID or not, called can still track down your fax number
with
| > call
| > | > ID
| > | > > or *69, I'm surprised you haven't been caught
| > | >
| > | > *67 for call ID. *69 just rings my line and they get the fax tone.
| > | > js
| > | >
| > | >
| > | up here *69 results in some sultry throated damsel saying "the last
| number
| > | to call your line was ..."
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|

 

[Crash Gordon]

Just the Fax Jack, Just the Fax.





|
| | > | > > you know that's not kosher to do that...actually i believe it's
illegal
| to
| > > not show your fax id info.
| >
| > I know. The cops seem to be busy with other things though.
| > js
|
| Next on COPS...
|
| "FREEZE AND DROP THAT FAX LINE NOW!"
|
| Make sure you are wearing shorts, no shirt and be half drunk please
|
|

 

[alarman]

Just the Fax Jack, Just the Fax.

Ha ha, reminds me of his famous "Claude Cooper copper clapper caper."
js

 

[Norm Mugford]

IMO....I would say that Jim's opinions of RLB,
are much more accurate than yours. Of course
I have met RLB.....

Maybe it's too cold up there in Canada for you to see through
all the snow........

Norm Mugford

 

[Jim]

Why aren't you ragging Crash for not slamming RLB like you do RH Campbell?

Because Campbell actually says that SFB is an OK guy and thinks that
it's everybody else who causes the problems.

Crash at least knows what's going on, and occasionally let's his
opinion be known but (mostly) chooses to stay out of it.

But you've proved my opinion of you to be accurate ....... again.

 

[R.H.Campbell]

No, I don't say RLB's an OK guy, nor do I say he is the monster you say he
is. I simply don't know; I have never met the man. I judge people on the
newsgroup by what they say and how they act in relation to answering
questions etc on security matters. That's all any of us are here for.

I see him answering people's questions in a straightforward way, although
like all of us, he is not always correct. He gets offensive when attached in
the most vicious ways by you and others. His motives for being on the
newsgroup are to help others and to sell his wares to DIY'ers, but at least
he answers DIY questions without making them feel stupid or belittling them
for their lack of knowledge. You on the other hand,often fill the newsgroup
with hateful, ignorant crap that does nothing to assist anyone here. So when
it comes right down to it, who's more of a problem here...

To use your own words, "you've proved my opinion of you to be
accurate...again"

RHC

 

[Frank Olson]

No, I don't say RLB's an OK guy, nor do I say he is the monster you say he
is. I simply don't know; I have never met the man. I judge people on the
newsgroup by what they say and how they act in relation to answering
questions etc on security matters. That's all any of us are here for.

Really?? Man, Rob... You need to clean your glasses. Or take off those
rose coloured ones you're wearing.

I see him answering people's questions in a straightforward way, although
like all of us, he is not always correct.

There are several "problems" with respect to the way he answers questions.
Which Newsgroup have you been reading??

He gets offensive when attached in the most vicious ways by you and
others.

I haven't "attached" him for months. He's been as "vicious" as always. I
suppose pointing this out isn't something you're interested in, though.

His motives for being on the newsgroup are to help others and to sell his
wares to DIY'ers, but at least he answers DIY questions without making
them feel stupid or belittling them for their lack of knowledge.

No. He doesn't belittle them. He only belittles the trade, installers, the
"IB", and the "big box" companies... Oh... I forgot... You do the last
part too... )

You on the other hand,often fill the newsgroup with hateful, ignorant crap
that does nothing to assist anyone here. So when it comes right down to
it, who's more of a problem here...

When has Jim failed to answer a DIYer's question?? Where has he ever
belittled one?? Seems to me his "focus" has been responding to RLB's
numerous "protestations of innocence" and more than a few "jabs" at the
trade. There are many professionals that post here. I quite frankly don't
see any other online store working the group like RLB does. I think he
takes a perverse pleasure in pushing our buttons. "How high can I get the
IB to jump??" Sound familiar?? Ever notice how peaceful it gets around
here without him?? Ever notice what starts off the "kicks and giggles"??
Is it Jim?? Me?? Mike?? Graham?? If he does come back, sit back and
watch how long it takes for him to use Jim's (or mine) name in one of his
responses. See how long it takes for him to link a response to one of the
"buy me" buttons on his website, or to use one of his rather numerous and
colourful turns of phrase designed to "put down" the trade...