M
Mike Monett
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
John Larkin said:On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 07:09:12 -0700 (PDT), Rob Mitchell
Designing a car, $22,000 isn't seed money, it's barely beer money.
John
That may be the plan
Mike Monett
John Larkin said:On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 07:09:12 -0700 (PDT), Rob Mitchell
Designing a car, $22,000 isn't seed money, it's barely beer money.
John
Kris said:Dirk Bruere wrote
That's why they stopped making the Saturn SL1. Larger profit margins on
SUVs.
OK, my 2002 does have air conditioning and power steering
What amamzes me is that the Infinity I35 (whcih they also stopped making) is
a fairly large car, very nice interior, comfortable, has more than enough
"zip", and gets about 26MPG mixed city-highway. Meanwhile the much smaller,
cramped, delayed-accelerating, poorly-handling, hard-riding G35 that I had as
a loaner didn't even reach 20MPG. I was looking at new cars becasue I'd
thought that, Surely there are now ones that get better MPHG than my SL1, but
amazingly, even the teensy cars weren't any better (I get about 30MPH mixed,
and teh tiny ones max at about 35 mpg *highway*, but there is no way of
telling what the Mixed mpg works out to be).
So I'm not getting rid of my SL1 any time soon...
They need a safe family car, not a 2-seat plastic roadster with zero luggage space.
Eric said:Don't batteries lose capacity as the temperature drops?
For those in colder climates might not work too great..
Sure the price will drop as they automate the assembly of the vehicle.
That's what gets me about regular car prices, alot of the car is put
together by machines these days. Yet the prices don't seem to come down
much.
Richard said:That's because of the unions.
Welll .... if that electricity comes from carbon or hydrocarbon sources then
there's no benefit at all.
Better start building those new generation nukes ! Biggest order so far for
the French firm Areva which I reckon to be the market leader ? CHINA !
Something like 6 units on order there alone. India's building some too.
Graham
Eeyore said:Hiring can be damn expensive. Plus you have to adapt to an unfamiliar car.
Eeyore said:I always love that fable.
The cost of the battery.
Eeyore said:Yes you need a PHEV which is what GM at least is developing seriously.
The issue of recharging points is an EXTREMELY valid one too. Who's going to pay
for them and who's going to stop vandals from trashing them ?
Eeyore said:Which will offer ZERO CO2 emissions benefit.
Bwahahahahhaahahaaaaa ! Do you think they only just invented them ? And it IS
done on a large scale !
PV solar is INSANELY expensive by design. Only Nanosolar are claiming to offer
anything better but they won't release data. Smells of something nasty to me.
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Would it meet today's safety standard for a new vehicle?
a few more numbers hereAgain, I do not see why that should not drop in price as well, at least
to the point of an equivalent lead-acid system.
In England they are paid to drink crappy tea and not make those
little clown cars.
And these are the cars some Europeans keep telling us belong on US
roads?
Rob Mitchellwrote:
It doesn't take big bucks to do useful stuffhttp://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/delorean/
--
Dirk
http://www.transcendence.me.uk/- Transcendence UKhttp://www.theconsensus.org/- A UK political partyhttp://www.onetribe.me.uk/wordpress/?cat=5- Ourpodcasts on weird stuff- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Starbucks? I have never been in any of them. I haven't even had a
cup of coffee in almost 40 years. Not to mention, but over 600
Starbucks? are being phased out.
It's Europe where those tiny, death traps on wheels are made, not the
US.
Martin said:a few more numbers here
http://www.dancewithshadows.com/avi...mini-plane-makes-flying-cheaper-than-driving/
martin
Kris said:Rather tahn me just specualting, I did a search:
https://shop.sae.org/technical/papers/970743
QUOTED MATERIAL: "The main conclusions from this work are that: fuel type
and equivalence ratio have major influences on both total hydrocarbon and
methane emissions; spark timing affects total hydrocarbon and methane
emissions significantly; increasing engine speed decreases total
hydrocarbon emissions for both fuels; during cold start and warm-up
operations, gasoline emitted a much higher excess of total hydrocarbons at
first start compared with natural gas; and exhaust gas recirculation gave
lower oxides of nitrogen emissions for natural gas than for gasoline
fuelling."
http://www.eere.energy.gov/afdc/vehicles/natural_gas_emissions.html
QUOTED MATERIAL: "The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency calculated the
potential benefits of CNG versus gasoline based on the inherently cleaner-
burning characteristics of natural gas, summarized in Clean Alternative
Fuels: Compressed Natural Gas (PDF 76 KB). Download Adobe Reader.
Reduce carbon monoxide emissions 90%-97%
Reduce carbon dioxide emissions 25%
Reduce nitrogen oxide emissions 35%-60%
Potentially reduce non-methane hydrocarbon emissions 50%-75%
Emit fewer toxic and carcinogenic pollutants
Emit little or no particulate matter
Eliminate evaporative emissions "
http://74.125.95.104/search?
q=cache:QP5PFW8hoGoJ:www.ucsusa.org/clean_vehicles/big_rig_cleanup/natural-
gas-vehicles.html+emissions+comparison+natural-
gas+gasoline&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=7&gl=us
Here is the Google search line I used:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=emissions+comparison+natural-
gas+gasoline
Not yet, it isn't. What will lower prices most significantly is increasing
conversion of gov.t buildings. Alhtough conversions being done by
corporations such as WalMart will also be an important factor.
Interestingly, I've not seen discussion of the effect of the rooftop shade
offered by solar panels.
Also, given that teh power utilities do buy back power, that would
contribute to the long-term savings offered by solar.
And before denegrating *every* non-petroleum energy source, how about
offering a solution to a finite resource (other than that you believe
you'll croak off before it runs out)?
It's real easy to sit on one's ass, say "that's stupid", and merely
contribute to the problem - what's hard is getting off one's ass and taking
some sort of action that's actually constructive.
By design, ro by circumstance or necessity...?
It's called "proprietary info", and it's common for companies in all
sectors to not release their trade secrets. What will need to be seen is
what results are shown from tests.
Yes, despite the naysayers and those who are addicted to the status quo, at
least some people *are* doing research and testing ideas.